Today’s Readings: Psalm 99; Song of Solomon 8:1-7; Matthew 9:18-26; 1 John 4:7-12; Psalm 103
One of the challenges we face in developing our personal theology as monotheists (people who believe in just one God) is to develop a belief system that truly addresses the expansive nature of God. Let me give you an example of what I mean here. Individuals who are polytheists (people who believe in multiple Gods) have an easier time compartmentalizing aspects of the world and attributing very specific qualities to each god. Ancient Greeks, for instance, could turn to a goddess like Aphrodite to represent love and beauty. Ares, on the other hand, was used by the Greeks to embody things like war, murder, and bloodshed. By having multiple gods, the individual could simply pick and chose which god they wanted to relate to in any given circumstance. As monotheists, however, we don’t have that luxury; we simply have one God who covers the totality of the world. So why am I talking about the challenges of monotheism? Well, in today’s second psalm, the psalmist take time in verses 3-5 to list all of the qualities he associates with God: things like forgiveness, healing, redemption, love, mercy, goodness, and renewer of youth. All of these qualities are good. But what happens when we face aspects of life that aren’t so warm and fuzzy – things like brokenness, death, downfall, apathy, cruelty, badness, and decay? Does this mean that God is not present in these difficult places? Some would respond to my question by saying that another god of sorts – Satan – takes over in such places. How would you respond to my question about where God is in relation to those things in life that are cold and prickly? Is God only the God of what we would perceive of or label as warm and fuzzy, or is God truly the God of all? Til next time…
One of the challenges we face in developing our personal theology as monotheists (people who believe in just one God) is to develop a belief system that truly addresses the expansive nature of God. Let me give you an example of what I mean here. Individuals who are polytheists (people who believe in multiple Gods) have an easier time compartmentalizing aspects of the world and attributing very specific qualities to each god. Ancient Greeks, for instance, could turn to a goddess like Aphrodite to represent love and beauty. Ares, on the other hand, was used by the Greeks to embody things like war, murder, and bloodshed. By having multiple gods, the individual could simply pick and chose which god they wanted to relate to in any given circumstance. As monotheists, however, we don’t have that luxury; we simply have one God who covers the totality of the world. So why am I talking about the challenges of monotheism? Well, in today’s second psalm, the psalmist take time in verses 3-5 to list all of the qualities he associates with God: things like forgiveness, healing, redemption, love, mercy, goodness, and renewer of youth. All of these qualities are good. But what happens when we face aspects of life that aren’t so warm and fuzzy – things like brokenness, death, downfall, apathy, cruelty, badness, and decay? Does this mean that God is not present in these difficult places? Some would respond to my question by saying that another god of sorts – Satan – takes over in such places. How would you respond to my question about where God is in relation to those things in life that are cold and prickly? Is God only the God of what we would perceive of or label as warm and fuzzy, or is God truly the God of all? Til next time…